I recently replace my brakes. The front pads looked accurate. They looked to be about 25% worn. So I put them back on. The reverse shoes were pretty worn down, almost to the metal, I would say in the region of 95% worn. I bought the vehicle new, and the shoes and pads are the original that came with the vehicle. Also, in the region of a year ago, my ABS light came on and have been on ever since. My question is; what is cause the front to rear wear difference on the pads/shoes? Could this be something with the ABS system specifically doing this?
This is on a 1999 Isuzu Rodeo, with 112000 miles. Manual Shift, 2.2 L engine.
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
Abs light could be on due to dirt on the sensor. it seems that your brakes are wearing unequally, this could be due to a number of factors. best to replace adjectives at the same time with impossible to tell apart make and specification.
the abs is keeping the flipside brakes on...are u sure they are original...112,000 miles on front pads ?? u must singular go up hill and never stop...the front pad should wear out 2 to 1... to the back...something is wrong.
Answers: This is not normal, as the front pad generally wearout about 3 to 1 as compared to the rear legs. Therefore if it has parking brake activated on reverse axle, - I would assume they drove around a lot with parking brake on! Or possibly the "shuttle valve) on brakes have shut off one circuit, - causing adjectives the braking to be on rear wheels! This can come about if there was a bleed in brakeline somewhere - this is supposed to prevent the "2 circuit" brake system from failing completely,- so that you can't stop at all! (has be around since the 60s)! This should be obvious, if it is pretty hard to stop from road speed!
However I would assume that the front pad had already been replaced a coulple times by the time you get the car!
I get a bout 100K out of front pad in std. trans vehicle, --because I do most of the slowing down using friction and downshifting. Which means I do not arrive 50 foot from stopsign doing 40mph! I start shifting down 150 - 200 feet before stop, and am solitary going 10 mph or so which doesn't take much brake to stop all the means of access!
The ABS light might just be recitation you the the brake fluid is low, - or the the shuttle valve is stuck,- or that the system actually have other problems. Ther newer ones have electronic ABS systems, and can be a "real nightmare" to fix (moneywise),- when they obtain fouled up!
Abs light could be on due to dirt on the sensor. it seems that your brakes are wearing unequally, this could be due to a number of factors. best to replace adjectives at the same time with impossible to tell apart make and specification.
Have your brake system checked. Most braking is done by the front brakes. The front brakes have to be changed twice as recurrently as the rear. Pads usually have to be replaced every 30,000 miles, and the shoes every 60,000. I would check your service annals, the front probably have been replaced at some point, and the pay for are the original.
The ABS light can be as simple as a fuse, check that, and consequently you may need to look as the sensors.
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
the abs is keeping the flipside brakes on...are u sure they are original...112,000 miles on front pads ?? u must singular go up hill and never stop...the front pad should wear out 2 to 1... to the back...something is wrong.
However you also may have aquired a bit of nouns in the front brake lines (air compresses fluid dose not).
Bleed your brake system , starting with the most distant wheel from the brake master cylinder, working your way around to the closest.
This is assuming you hold always changed both the front and rear pad . And not just the front . like is commonly done.
And assuming you own 4 wheel disc brakes
I can assure you the front brake pads enjoy been replaced a minimum of two times. The rear shoes other wear slower than the front pads because of the front brake bias toward the front of the vehicle. On any car especially front tiller drive cars front pads wear 2-3 times faster than rear shoes.
Now, things revision with rear disc brakes. The pad and rotors are much smaller than the front and they wear at almost the same rate as the front pads and rotors.
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
Have your brake system checked. Most braking is done by the front brakes. The front brakes have to be changed twice as recurrently as the rear. Pads usually have to be replaced every 30,000 miles, and the shoes every 60,000. I would check your service annals, the front probably have been replaced at some point, and the pay for are the original.
The ABS light can be as simple as a fuse, check that, and consequently you may need to look as the sensors.
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
I can assure you the front brake pads enjoy been replaced a minimum of two times. The rear shoes other wear slower than the front pads because of the front brake bias toward the front of the vehicle. On any car especially front tiller drive cars front pads wear 2-3 times faster than rear shoes.
Now, things revision with rear disc brakes. The pad and rotors are much smaller than the front and they wear at almost the same rate as the front pads and rotors.
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
This is on a 1999 Isuzu Rodeo, with 112000 miles. Manual Shift, 2.2 L engine.
Trouble starting vehicle, please aid!!?
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
Knocking contained by 99 Dodge Dakota?
Abs light could be on due to dirt on the sensor. it seems that your brakes are wearing unequally, this could be due to a number of factors. best to replace adjectives at the same time with impossible to tell apart make and specification.
1994 dodge bump I enjoy no warmth,?
How do you remove and replace a...
the abs is keeping the flipside brakes on...are u sure they are original...112,000 miles on front pads ?? u must singular go up hill and never stop...the front pad should wear out 2 to 1... to the back...something is wrong.
Answers: This is not normal, as the front pad generally wearout about 3 to 1 as compared to the rear legs. Therefore if it has parking brake activated on reverse axle, - I would assume they drove around a lot with parking brake on! Or possibly the "shuttle valve) on brakes have shut off one circuit, - causing adjectives the braking to be on rear wheels! This can come about if there was a bleed in brakeline somewhere - this is supposed to prevent the "2 circuit" brake system from failing completely,- so that you can't stop at all! (has be around since the 60s)! This should be obvious, if it is pretty hard to stop from road speed!
However I would assume that the front pad had already been replaced a coulple times by the time you get the car!
I get a bout 100K out of front pad in std. trans vehicle, --because I do most of the slowing down using friction and downshifting. Which means I do not arrive 50 foot from stopsign doing 40mph! I start shifting down 150 - 200 feet before stop, and am solitary going 10 mph or so which doesn't take much brake to stop all the means of access!
The ABS light might just be recitation you the the brake fluid is low, - or the the shuttle valve is stuck,- or that the system actually have other problems. Ther newer ones have electronic ABS systems, and can be a "real nightmare" to fix (moneywise),- when they obtain fouled up!
Abs light could be on due to dirt on the sensor. it seems that your brakes are wearing unequally, this could be due to a number of factors. best to replace adjectives at the same time with impossible to tell apart make and specification.
Have your brake system checked. Most braking is done by the front brakes. The front brakes have to be changed twice as recurrently as the rear. Pads usually have to be replaced every 30,000 miles, and the shoes every 60,000. I would check your service annals, the front probably have been replaced at some point, and the pay for are the original.
The ABS light can be as simple as a fuse, check that, and consequently you may need to look as the sensors.
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
2004 Olds Alero nouns mount problems...Help me...
well you could be driving from time to time beside the parking brake up(engaged) ...that will wear the back break faster than you can say unclethe abs is keeping the flipside brakes on...are u sure they are original...112,000 miles on front pads ?? u must singular go up hill and never stop...the front pad should wear out 2 to 1... to the back...something is wrong.
How much does it cost to replace...
It may be whats call a "proportioning valve" somewhere surrounded by your break system. You need a book.However you also may have aquired a bit of nouns in the front brake lines (air compresses fluid dose not).
Bleed your brake system , starting with the most distant wheel from the brake master cylinder, working your way around to the closest.
This is assuming you hold always changed both the front and rear pad . And not just the front . like is commonly done.
And assuming you own 4 wheel disc brakes
I can assure you the front brake pads enjoy been replaced a minimum of two times. The rear shoes other wear slower than the front pads because of the front brake bias toward the front of the vehicle. On any car especially front tiller drive cars front pads wear 2-3 times faster than rear shoes.
Now, things revision with rear disc brakes. The pad and rotors are much smaller than the front and they wear at almost the same rate as the front pads and rotors.
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
My switch on my '92 GMC safari...
front pads do the most stopping and will want replacing like every other yr 10 to 20,000 miles the back brakes are for close to hard stopping and parking and only involve replacing every other time you have the fronts done in most cases.. and the right side will wear out beforehand the left.. cause of the lofty center of the road ways. and after you drive it til the brake light comes on then it requirements to be reset .. not hard to check brakes for wear.. jack it up and remove front wheel. look at the wipe it should be thicker than the medal its glued to if its not after its bad remember the last time you done the front brakes and the subsequent time to the rears alsoHave your brake system checked. Most braking is done by the front brakes. The front brakes have to be changed twice as recurrently as the rear. Pads usually have to be replaced every 30,000 miles, and the shoes every 60,000. I would check your service annals, the front probably have been replaced at some point, and the pay for are the original.
The ABS light can be as simple as a fuse, check that, and consequently you may need to look as the sensors.
112000 miles on your original brake pad??
never been know that...are you sure?
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
How recurrently should i metamorphosis my blinker...
I can assure you the front brake pads enjoy been replaced a minimum of two times. The rear shoes other wear slower than the front pads because of the front brake bias toward the front of the vehicle. On any car especially front tiller drive cars front pads wear 2-3 times faster than rear shoes.
Now, things revision with rear disc brakes. The pad and rotors are much smaller than the front and they wear at almost the same rate as the front pads and rotors.
This is unusual. On any motor I've ever worked on, it's always the front pads to walk first because most of the stopping force is applied there due to the weight verbs when stopping. Not to mention that usually the self adjusting mechanism on the reverse drum brakes usually doesn't work like it should so as the rear brakes wear, they won't be wearing at matching rate as the front brakes. They wear slower. The only thing I could ponder of would be that maybe a valve contained by the ABS unit stuck or malfunctioned cause the rear brakes to stay engaged making the flipside brakes wear out prematurely.
I've NEVER EVER seen ANY brake pads/shoes last 112,000 miles.
Resolved Questions
- I cant return with brakes on my...
- My coup¨¦ revs to big?
- I'm on a Double 00 indicator right...
- How do I give somebody a lift...
- Engine problem...?
- Switching tire sizes.?
- Cruise control on saloon doesn't work?
- Can my ECU from my GSR be...
- What are the steps contained by sports...
- Are adjectives 4Runner's 4 Wheel Drive?