http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/120/...
You've gotta read this one!! Detroit could do this, they just choose not to. What do you muse?
Answers: I saw the Impala he built for Pimp My Ride that was biodiesel. And enjoy owned a VW Rabbit pickup that has be converted to biodiesel for several years. I still average about 75mpg on a daily basis from it.
As for a turbine powering a generator, it is great for publicity but not very practical. First of adjectives, a turbine is a very expensive engine to produce due to the extensive extra diligence that must be taken when building it. If you are going to turn anything as fast as a turbine spins, later it has to be faultless. That isn't cheap.
Second, as Chrysler found when they built and tested turbine cars during the early 60's, turbines are raucous, and very resentful. That is why plane engines are inspected so regularly, and why mechanics check everything prior to every flight. I doubt that a consumer is willing to enjoy his vehicle inspected by a trained jet mechanic prior to every drive he make.
But, manufacturers are already offerering diesel/electric and gas/electric hybrids, and it is a proven design that can generate as much power as a standard engine alone, and still generate better discount. Reference Honda Accords fastest, and most powerful engine combination is the gas/electric hybrid model. I see this as the near futures best bet as to what direction manufacturer will take.
Pure fuel cell cars, such as those that run on hydrogen, are still enormously early surrounded by thier development. There are some that own entered carrying out tests in fleets, but they are unqualified for mass marketing. Fuel storage, and a fuel delivery system still is a problem.
freshly BS
You've gotta read this one!! Detroit could do this, they just choose not to. What do you muse?
Answers: I saw the Impala he built for Pimp My Ride that was biodiesel. And enjoy owned a VW Rabbit pickup that has be converted to biodiesel for several years. I still average about 75mpg on a daily basis from it.
As for a turbine powering a generator, it is great for publicity but not very practical. First of adjectives, a turbine is a very expensive engine to produce due to the extensive extra diligence that must be taken when building it. If you are going to turn anything as fast as a turbine spins, later it has to be faultless. That isn't cheap.
Second, as Chrysler found when they built and tested turbine cars during the early 60's, turbines are raucous, and very resentful. That is why plane engines are inspected so regularly, and why mechanics check everything prior to every flight. I doubt that a consumer is willing to enjoy his vehicle inspected by a trained jet mechanic prior to every drive he make.
But, manufacturers are already offerering diesel/electric and gas/electric hybrids, and it is a proven design that can generate as much power as a standard engine alone, and still generate better discount. Reference Honda Accords fastest, and most powerful engine combination is the gas/electric hybrid model. I see this as the near futures best bet as to what direction manufacturer will take.
Pure fuel cell cars, such as those that run on hydrogen, are still enormously early surrounded by thier development. There are some that own entered carrying out tests in fleets, but they are unqualified for mass marketing. Fuel storage, and a fuel delivery system still is a problem.
Whats Much Better Riding a Bus and...
freshly BS
Resolved Questions
- What motor should I acquire for commuting?
- Where does Kwik Trip gas stations return...
- CAN anyone recount me if I can...
- Miserable london tube commuters?
- I am going to bc...its going to...
- Motorway lane mark interview?
- What's the commute similar to from Irvington...
- How does everyone quality more or less...
- How much would it cost to drive...
- Is it true that cheaper petrol from...