I left my house going North around 7:35 am to go to conservatory, and it was very icy out, so I be going kept staying between 45 and 50 mph. I got 6 miles away from my house, and I saw ambulance lights about a mile ahead doing a tour, so I knew I had to slow down. I tap on my break slowly, and my car swerved all over the road, I lost control, go into the right side ditch, came back out, and terminated up in my lane, still facing the same path, but turned more towards the Northeast. I got out of my car to see if any hurt was done, and none was done. I saw a truck coming in the region of a mile away, so I got back contained by my car, so I could move it fully to the side of the road to avoid an accident. Well in about 5 seconds, the truck hit the posterior, left end of my saloon, while I was moving it, and the truck ended up surrounded by the left side cornfield. There was pull done to my car and the truck. There was a complete other lane that it could enjoy passed in. Who should pay? I'm a moment ago looking for opinons.
both at fault. you for stopping where you did. if the sports car was unhurt, why did you not stop sour the roadway?
the other car for not maintaing control.
the insurance companies are probably arguing over fault precentages.
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
If he Hit you in The Rear Its His breakdown
Answers: Well, to begin with you be driving too fast for conditions, which is why you wound up in the ditch. But later you were stopped, or near stopped, and the other vehicle be driving too fast for conditions and hit you as a result. He is fully at fault and his insurance will foot for your damage.
If he Hit you in The Rear Its His breakdown
your fault 1 you were going to prompt for condition 2 you were stopped in splash of traffic what you should of done was pulled to a safe place to check for damages next to flashers on
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
both at fault. you for stopping where you did. if the sports car was unhurt, why did you not stop sour the roadway?
the other car for not maintaing control.
the insurance companies are probably arguing over fault precentages.
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
your fault 1 you were going to prompt for condition 2 you were stopped in splash of traffic what you should of done was pulled to a safe place to check for damages next to flashers on
Do enjoy to be insured underneath a...
based on your work of art it looks like you be in the middle of your lane stopped, which is illegal. you will probably be charged next to failure to maintain your vehicle or irresponsible driving. in the end both of you are going to expire up payingboth at fault. you for stopping where you did. if the sports car was unhurt, why did you not stop sour the roadway?
the other car for not maintaing control.
the insurance companies are probably arguing over fault precentages.
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
If you buy a sports car that's...
If he Hit you in The Rear Its His breakdown
I hit my son's coup¨¦! (Insurance...
Answers: Well, to begin with you be driving too fast for conditions, which is why you wound up in the ditch. But later you were stopped, or near stopped, and the other vehicle be driving too fast for conditions and hit you as a result. He is fully at fault and his insurance will foot for your damage.
If he Hit you in The Rear Its His breakdown
About to travel out of state to...
your fault 1 you were going to prompt for condition 2 you were stopped in splash of traffic what you should of done was pulled to a safe place to check for damages next to flashers on
Taking Out the Keys while driving?
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
In Georgia, can you legitimately insure a...
both at fault. you for stopping where you did. if the sports car was unhurt, why did you not stop sour the roadway?
the other car for not maintaing control.
the insurance companies are probably arguing over fault precentages.
Normally I would vote that if someone rear ends you they are normally 100% at shortcoming. These is a possibility someone could find comparative negligence on you though for your actions in this happenstance. To stop on an icy highway in the right lane just to check your saloon for damages instead of pulling off to the side of the road could be considered gross negligence by some. Also according to most contracts you have a duty to mitigate your damages from an twist of fate. While its not clear that your car was ever if truth be told damaged from the initial driving off the road scenario, the reality you thought it may have been tattered and stopped in the middle of the road to inspect it when it was smoothly able to be driven off the side of the road could be considered a letdown to mitigate your damages and your insurance company, or an arbitrator, may find some negligence on your part.
Anything doomed to failure happen to you...
legally, I dont know who should pay. If it be up to me you would pay you shouldnt park in the middle of the road reguardless of whether he could intervene you or notyour fault 1 you were going to prompt for condition 2 you were stopped in splash of traffic what you should of done was pulled to a safe place to check for damages next to flashers on
Resolved Questions
- Car insurance after a brake fiasco and...
- Car fluke no saloon insurance?
- Dealing next to a no insurance ticket....
- If ur the most important insurer of...
- What is the best coup¨¦ insurance company...
- Claims adjuster keep calling me wanting to...
- Vandalism write stale?
- Can I buy a exotic motor within...
- How unyielding is it to capture a...
- I get reverse done and get a...