like the curfew and stuff.this is for a debate for my english class..please write the pros and cons of this
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
There really are no cons. The pros are that inexperienced drivers are not allowed to drive during those times when the number of drunk drivers doing a tour is highest and the chances for life-threatening accidents are also their highest.
P.S.: Driving law should be more strict in California. I lived there for 7 years and Californians can't drive worth a $hit...
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
Answers: The age for learning to drive should be 21.
New drivers should be constrained for two years after passing a test to low-performance cars.
There should be a extent of six months after passing the test the clean driver should not be allowed to drive on the highways.
After that time they have to hold ten supervised lessons on highways beside a driving school.
A driving log book would be required to show the driver has carried these course out.
This should be done for all 50 states.
There really are no cons. The pros are that inexperienced drivers are not allowed to drive during those times when the number of drunk drivers doing a tour is highest and the chances for life-threatening accidents are also their highest.
P.S.: Driving law should be more strict in California. I lived there for 7 years and Californians can't drive worth a $hit...
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
What is the most not dangerous vehicle...
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
Why don`t they put places around contained...
There really are no cons. The pros are that inexperienced drivers are not allowed to drive during those times when the number of drunk drivers doing a tour is highest and the chances for life-threatening accidents are also their highest.
P.S.: Driving law should be more strict in California. I lived there for 7 years and Californians can't drive worth a $hit...
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
Answers: The age for learning to drive should be 21.
New drivers should be constrained for two years after passing a test to low-performance cars.
There should be a extent of six months after passing the test the clean driver should not be allowed to drive on the highways.
After that time they have to hold ten supervised lessons on highways beside a driving school.
A driving log book would be required to show the driver has carried these course out.
This should be done for all 50 states.
There really are no cons. The pros are that inexperienced drivers are not allowed to drive during those times when the number of drunk drivers doing a tour is highest and the chances for life-threatening accidents are also their highest.
P.S.: Driving law should be more strict in California. I lived there for 7 years and Californians can't drive worth a $hit...
NO. The trial curfew in California for anyone under the age of 18 is 10 PM. How is that not rational? You need to learn to work around restrictions. That's duration, dude.
Imagine how you would feel if you got into a vehicle accident and your passenger was kill? In most fatal car accident, the passengers are the ones who die, not the driver. When you are driving a car, you are responsible for the sanctuary of other people on the road as resourcefully as your passengers. In my high college (before all the restrictions), 20 people be killed in saloon accidents. I did statistics. Of those 25 people, 16 of them be passengers, the driver survived and no drugs or alcohol were found at adjectives. 3 of the accidents were passenger where the driver was drunk, and the driver survived. The rest be killed BY a drunk driver after 11 PM.
Does that help? A driver is more potential to survive a car accident than the passenger. While it's true that you are more likely to get contained by a car accident within a parking lot or ten miles away from home, those accidents are rarely cruel. The majority of FATAL accidents happen at dark, between the hours of 10PM and 3AM.
The reasons for all those restrictions? Your parents don't want you insensible. I mean, why do you wear a condom, even if you're both sure that you don't have disease and it's not the time of month for pregnancy? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN. Why do you wear a seatbelt, even if you are with the sole purpose driving 5 miles? BECAUSE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN.
Georgia Driving Test - do I run...
Resolved Questions
- Truckers: when you turn vanished at a...
- Police vehicle serpentine on the freeway?
- Do I involve chains if driving to...
- Driving problems?
- Can a child undamagingly be held on...
- Is it crushing and difficult for countries...
- Who have the right of passageway at...
- Turning gone at an intersection whos right...
- Auto catastrophe involved 3 cars, mine is...
- Why is in attendance no regulation,to stop...