I was travelling straight through a T section intersection at a green flimsy and the car tuurning right to cross my path come speeding along and hit me on the drivers side front end. He is saying that he have the green arrow but I know I had the green light. We looked at the sequence of the lights and he would own had a green light but not the green arrow. I also own a witness who was stopped at the red light to the moved out of me and she said she had been nearby for 1 minute and saw the car speeding and hit me. The green arrow goes on when the pale goes green for 7 seconds and consequently goes red and after 3 seconds it go off but the light is green he can engineer that turn but only when it is safe to turn. I know I am not at culpability but am concerned as I dont have insurance.
If in attendance was a solid green light afterwards its his fault but you are at fault for not have insurance. Did you call the police? I am surprised he didn't call the police for you not have any insurance
If they only have a green light then they must concede, making them at fault
As for insurance, you should not be doing a tour in the first place until you are properly insured. Had the situation been reversed, you would've be in deep s***.
You are the one who have the right of way. His fault. His insurance should embezzle care of your car.
If in attendance was a solid green light afterwards its his fault but you are at fault for not have insurance. Did you call the police? I am surprised he didn't call the police for you not have any insurance
He is at fault for not yielding. If the police be involved and you were cited for not having insurance, you will be required to directory for an sr-22 form and it can be very expensive.
You are the one who have the right of way. His fault. His insurance should embezzle care of your car.
Insurance is not compulsory in ALL states surrounded by the USA, but it is in most, as well as surrounded by most other developed countries. If the police were involved in the catastrophe at all they'd have ticketed you for no insurance if it be compulsory, then ticketed the other guy for failure to give up (assuming the properly questioned the witnesses). However who gets the ticket is a criminal court situation, and who's insurance pays is a civil court matter - so even if he gets the ticket the insurance can still state it your fault. You're screwed.
Your only deliverance may be in that witness of yours and the sue-happy country we live in. If the guy's insurance rules contained by his favor, you can sue them for damages anyway. Just make sure you keep that witness's phone number handy.
if you be driving straight throught a T intersection and got hit by another vehicle turning right to hit you on the driver's side, you must have be driving on the wrong side of the road. If you meant to say they be turning left and you blew the light (which sounds more believable) you are both at failure and depending on where the damage be, will determine the percetange of fault. IE.. rear of the driver's door's routine more fault at other driver, etc.
He is at fault for not yielding. If the police be involved and you were cited for not having insurance, you will be required to directory for an sr-22 form and it can be very expensive. I would say that the other driver be at fault plus you have a witness and as for the insurance, economically that's a whole different story.
if you be driving straight throught a T intersection and got hit by another vehicle turning right to hit you on the driver's side, you must have be driving on the wrong side of the road. If you meant to say they be turning left and you blew the light (which sounds more believable) you are both at failure and depending on where the damage be, will determine the percetange of fault. IE.. rear of the driver's door's routine more fault at other driver, etc.
Answers: are you in australia?
if so can I POINT OUT TO AMERICANS THAT DAMAGE INSURANCE IS NOT COMPULSORY IN AUSTRALIA.
if you be going straight and someone has cut across you, then they hold turned into oncoming traffic when not safe to do so.
it is difficult to prove speeding, so i wouldn't rely on that as your only shield.
also, sometimes the sequences of lights can change, dependent on the traffic conditions or time of the day. ie crest traffic light sequences can differ from off height times.
if you can get a witness to back you up, stating that you have a green light at the time of the accident and the other vehicle has pulled in front of you (oncoming traffic) , next that would be your best defence.
If they only have a green light then they must concede, making them at fault
Question something like driving?
You're not at fault, but you'll expected get screwed some how because you don't have insurance.If in attendance was a solid green light afterwards its his fault but you are at fault for not have insurance. Did you call the police? I am surprised he didn't call the police for you not have any insurance
If they only have a green light then they must concede, making them at fault
Do pedestrians own the right of mode...
Technically, the other driver is at fault for failing to yield to the driver who be going straight on a green. It doesn't matter if he was speeding or not although that didn't help out the matter either. The point is, he poor to yield the right of way.As for insurance, you should not be doing a tour in the first place until you are properly insured. Had the situation been reversed, you would've be in deep s***.
You are the one who have the right of way. His fault. His insurance should embezzle care of your car.
Why do some individuals drive too slow...
If in attendance was a solid green light afterwards its his fault but you are at fault for not have insurance. Did you call the police? I am surprised he didn't call the police for you not have any insurance
What i call for to install deployed...
You wouldn't typically be at fault, but as it's illegal to drive minus insurance, you will be found at fault, the reasoning being that you shouldn't own been there at adjectives.He is at fault for not yielding. If the police be involved and you were cited for not having insurance, you will be required to directory for an sr-22 form and it can be very expensive.
3,000 word essay on danger of unsafe...
You are the one who have the right of way. His fault. His insurance should embezzle care of your car.
Can I justifiably drive next to my...
First off, since you don't enjoy insurance, you have no one to box for you regarding liability and damages. If you had insurance they would enjoy probably ruled in your favor and refused to reward damages to the other guy's car. Depending on your coverage level they also may own paid for repairs to your car next billed the other guy's insurance. Regardless of who is really at fault, the other guy's insurance will rule in his favor because they can, it's easier, and they don't enjoy to pay anything for it. You're screwed.Insurance is not compulsory in ALL states surrounded by the USA, but it is in most, as well as surrounded by most other developed countries. If the police were involved in the catastrophe at all they'd have ticketed you for no insurance if it be compulsory, then ticketed the other guy for failure to give up (assuming the properly questioned the witnesses). However who gets the ticket is a criminal court situation, and who's insurance pays is a civil court matter - so even if he gets the ticket the insurance can still state it your fault. You're screwed.
Your only deliverance may be in that witness of yours and the sue-happy country we live in. If the guy's insurance rules contained by his favor, you can sue them for damages anyway. Just make sure you keep that witness's phone number handy.
if you be driving straight throught a T intersection and got hit by another vehicle turning right to hit you on the driver's side, you must have be driving on the wrong side of the road. If you meant to say they be turning left and you blew the light (which sounds more believable) you are both at failure and depending on where the damage be, will determine the percetange of fault. IE.. rear of the driver's door's routine more fault at other driver, etc.
Does any one have any problems beside...
He is at fault for not yielding. If the police be involved and you were cited for not having insurance, you will be required to directory for an sr-22 form and it can be very expensive. I would say that the other driver be at fault plus you have a witness and as for the insurance, economically that's a whole different story.
Why do manufacturer formulate cars beside speeds...
if you be driving straight throught a T intersection and got hit by another vehicle turning right to hit you on the driver's side, you must have be driving on the wrong side of the road. If you meant to say they be turning left and you blew the light (which sounds more believable) you are both at failure and depending on where the damage be, will determine the percetange of fault. IE.. rear of the driver's door's routine more fault at other driver, etc.
Answers: are you in australia?
if so can I POINT OUT TO AMERICANS THAT DAMAGE INSURANCE IS NOT COMPULSORY IN AUSTRALIA.
if you be going straight and someone has cut across you, then they hold turned into oncoming traffic when not safe to do so.
it is difficult to prove speeding, so i wouldn't rely on that as your only shield.
also, sometimes the sequences of lights can change, dependent on the traffic conditions or time of the day. ie crest traffic light sequences can differ from off height times.
if you can get a witness to back you up, stating that you have a green light at the time of the accident and the other vehicle has pulled in front of you (oncoming traffic) , next that would be your best defence.
If they only have a green light then they must concede, making them at fault
Claim for whiplash injury my solicitor have...
Resolved Questions
- What do i do if a car's...
- RE: Safest distance between vehicle.?
- People recurrently park their cars within front...
- Is it celebration to enjoy superior insurance...
- Can I carry money for a sports...
- U.S CALIFORNIA backing! drivers ed! facilitate me...
- How much will a speeding ticket within...
- While we stop our cars,why we are...
- Have you??
- Do you agree that not everyone should...