People are caught and fined for the purpose of not fastening seat belt, but isn't it a paradox that the city buses are in need seat-belts.
Answers: I run a bus company, so I can explain this quite confidently.
Buses are the SAFEST means of transportation base on passenger miles, PERIOD. It's even safer than air travel as there's bazillion more buses than airplanes.
Tour coaches are high off the ground, so any impact will NOT imagined affect the passenger cabin. Just look at a Greyhound or similar motorcoach and see how big they are off the ground. Even an Escalade can't hit the passenger holiday home.
And judging by the vector of impact, any sort of knees belt would actually CAUSE more injuries, such as whiplash, than save. Esp. in worst satchel: head-on collision.
Adding shoulder belts is possible, but would require even further stiffening of the seat designs, and put together the seats non-adjustable (right in a minute, they usually recline for a moment, as least on coaches). That would require a total restyle of the motorcoaches, with millions already doing a tour, for no appreciable gain.
Thus, the only purpose for having the seatbelt is to prevent ejection contained by case of rollover, and you can do that by simply strengthening the window, and the window latch. Or by preventing rollovers with ABS brakes and/or stability control.
As for transit buses, as you are LEGALLY ALLOWED TO STAND within a transit bus, there's no reason to require form belts for seating passenger. However, some seatbelts are available for wheelchair anchor points and wheelchair passengers, who may hold trouble staying in their sitting room.
As for school buses, same arguments apply. They are elevated enough to tower over most cars, so any impact would be below the holiday home. The impact vector shows that in covering of collision, seatbelts do more harm than dutiful, as children tend to slide UNDER the belt, even the 3-point should/lap belts, causing internal injuries. Lap belts are worse, cause whiplash and head injuries (whereas in need seatbelt, your entire body hits, distributing the impact).
Also keep this surrounded by mind... the average fatality per year of a student dying from a school bus disaster is about 10 or so. Yes, entire year, entire US of A. At the cost of $2000 or so to outfit a bus beside seatbelts, outfitting the entire school bus fleet contained by the US would cost close to a BILLION dollars. That billion would be better spent on public education or other things. After adjectives, more students die just beforehand getting on a bus or just after getting rotten a bus, ran over by drivers who won't stop even when that red sign flips out.
Well conceivably because you would all die if a bus crash anyway so why bother near a seatbelt?
What is endorsement within an intersection?
Answers: I run a bus company, so I can explain this quite confidently.
Buses are the SAFEST means of transportation base on passenger miles, PERIOD. It's even safer than air travel as there's bazillion more buses than airplanes.
Tour coaches are high off the ground, so any impact will NOT imagined affect the passenger cabin. Just look at a Greyhound or similar motorcoach and see how big they are off the ground. Even an Escalade can't hit the passenger holiday home.
And judging by the vector of impact, any sort of knees belt would actually CAUSE more injuries, such as whiplash, than save. Esp. in worst satchel: head-on collision.
Adding shoulder belts is possible, but would require even further stiffening of the seat designs, and put together the seats non-adjustable (right in a minute, they usually recline for a moment, as least on coaches). That would require a total restyle of the motorcoaches, with millions already doing a tour, for no appreciable gain.
Thus, the only purpose for having the seatbelt is to prevent ejection contained by case of rollover, and you can do that by simply strengthening the window, and the window latch. Or by preventing rollovers with ABS brakes and/or stability control.
As for transit buses, as you are LEGALLY ALLOWED TO STAND within a transit bus, there's no reason to require form belts for seating passenger. However, some seatbelts are available for wheelchair anchor points and wheelchair passengers, who may hold trouble staying in their sitting room.
As for school buses, same arguments apply. They are elevated enough to tower over most cars, so any impact would be below the holiday home. The impact vector shows that in covering of collision, seatbelts do more harm than dutiful, as children tend to slide UNDER the belt, even the 3-point should/lap belts, causing internal injuries. Lap belts are worse, cause whiplash and head injuries (whereas in need seatbelt, your entire body hits, distributing the impact).
Also keep this surrounded by mind... the average fatality per year of a student dying from a school bus disaster is about 10 or so. Yes, entire year, entire US of A. At the cost of $2000 or so to outfit a bus beside seatbelts, outfitting the entire school bus fleet contained by the US would cost close to a BILLION dollars. That billion would be better spent on public education or other things. After adjectives, more students die just beforehand getting on a bus or just after getting rotten a bus, ran over by drivers who won't stop even when that red sign flips out.
I can't parallel park for the exam?
Well conceivably because you would all die if a bus crash anyway so why bother near a seatbelt?
Resolved Questions
- What tires work best on an suv...
- My mom died within a sports car...
- Will practising driving lone once a week...
- In some states, its undemocratic to use...
- Child restraints?
- Should I be held responsible for partially...
- Why should we own street lamp on...
- If a vehicle fail to afford the...
- Tether Strap surrounded by my Contour??!?
- Open country tires?